您的位置: 首页 » 法律资料网 » 法律论文 »

Remedies for non-performance:Perspectives from CISG, UNIDROIT Priniciples and PECL/刘成伟

时间:2024-07-02 21:53:38 来源: 法律资料网 作者:法律资料网 阅读:8837
下载地址: 点击此处下载
Remedies for non-performance:Perspectives from CISG, UNIDROIT Priniciples and PECL


INTRODUCTION


The growth of international trade makes some kind of unification necessary. Increased trade overseas has drawn attention to the problems that are caused by the different ways in which countries have chosen to regulate international sales. And the legal community has tried to facilitate overseas trade through efforts to harmonize national laws by legislative or non-legislative means.
Against such a background, the analysis in this contribution is focused on the CISG, UNIDROIT Principles and PECL -- three of the most important international instruments for the regulation of international commercial transactions which combine elements from both civil law and common law systems. In so doing, this contribution provides a comparative analysis of these instruments. It is merely thought that comparison is, probably, one of the most efficient ways to underline some of the unique features inherent in some legal regimes and to develop solutions to existing theoretical problems. However, as most of the authors dealing with the vast domain of this area would have done, the author in this contribution has never meant to make an exhaustive examination of international commercial law, bearing in mind that the ability of a single contribution to deal with its many issues is limited. The approach offered here is to review some of the key issues frequently befell in international trade, based on those generally accepted principles or elaborate rules as evidenced by international restatements or conventions and usages and practices or so-called lex mercatoria that is widely known to and regularly observed in international commercial transactions.
Particularly, it is said that no aspect of a system of contract law is more revealing of its underlying assumptions than is the law that prescribes the relief available for non-performance (breach). Issues relating to the remedial provisions are difficult and central substantive issues, which will no doubt be the focus of a large part of the discussion and deliberation surrounding application of commercial law on both a domestic and an international level. Therefore, the study in this contribution focuses, in light of traditional and modern theories, on the remedial scheme established under each of the three bodies of rules, namely Part III (partial) of the CISG, Chapter 7 of the UNIDROIT Principles and Chapters 8 and 9 of the PECL. In practical terms, these sectors are the substantive heart of the particular instruments. It is where the corresponding solutions to a large proportion of real world disputes in commercial transactions are to be found.
The comparative analysis contained speculates on the potential similarities and differences of these sectors, intending to enunciate rules which are common in international commercial law and at the same time to select the solutions which seem best adapted to the special requirements of international trade. One should note, however, that to the extent this contribution doesn’t give absolute priority to any one of the three instruments, whenever it is necessary to choose between conflicting rules and sometime then to derive a number of general principles which apply to all of the rules, what’s decisive to the criterion used is not just which rule is mandatory or adopted by the majority of jurisdictions, but rather which of the rules under consideration have the most persuasive value and/or appear to be particularly well suited for international commercial transactions.

Summary of Contents

PART I GENERAL REVIEW
Chapter 1 Sources of Inspiration
Chapter 2 Remedies Available upon Non-performance

PART II PRESERVING PERFORMANCE
Chapter 3 Specific Performance
Chapter 4 Nachfrist for Late Performance
Chapter 5 Cure by Non-performing Party
Chapter 6 Price Reduction for Non-conformity

PART III TERMINATION
Chapter 7 Right to Termination
Chapter 8 Fundamental Non-performance
Chapter 9 Anticipatory Non-performance
Chapter 10 Termination of Breached Installment or Part
Chapter 11 Declaration of Termination
Chapter 12 Effects of Termination

PART IV DAMAGES
Chapter 13 General Measure of Damages
Chapter 14 Limits to Claims for Damages
Chapter 15 Damages upon Termination
Chapter 16 Agreed Payment for Non-performance
Chapter 17 Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees
Chapter 18 Payment of Interest

PART V EXCUSES
Chapter 19 Change of Circumstances
Chapter 20 Force Majeure
Chapter 21 Hardship
Chapter 22 Force Majeure & Hardship Clauses

Table of Contents


PART I GENERAL REVIEW
Chapter 1 Sources of Inspiration

国务院安委会办公室关于四川省内江市威远县八田煤矿“11·21”透水事故的通报

国务院安全生产委员会


国务院安委会办公室关于四川省内江市威远县八田煤矿“11·21”透水事故的通报

安委办〔2010〕28号


各产煤省、自治区、直辖市及新疆生产建设兵团安全生产委员会:

2010年11月21日11时40分许,四川省内江市威远县八田煤矿发生一起老采空区透水事故,造成29人被困,透水量约5000立方米。事故发生后,党中央、国务院领导同志高度重视并作出重要批示,要求有关方面千方百计、全力以赴抢救被困人员。国家安全监管总局、国家煤矿安监局立即贯彻落实中央领导同志重要指示精神,委派国家煤矿安监局负责同志率工作组赶赴事故现场指导抢险救援。四川省政府负责同志率工作组赶赴现场,立即成立抢险救援指挥部,调集成建制的抢险救援和排水队伍,积极排水和实施有效救援。经各方共同努力,11月22日13时18分,29名被困矿工成功获救。有关方面和人员在事故抢险救援中做出了重要贡献,进一步积累了煤矿透水事故抢险救援的宝贵经验。

八田煤矿为乡镇煤矿,证照齐全,属独立扩能在建矿井,生产能力由5万吨/年扩能为6万吨/年。事故当班带班领导为副矿长陈荣辉。初步调查,事故原因为该矿在停产整顿期间违法违规擅自安排人员在井下南翼采煤工作面作业,揭穿采空区导致透水。

为深入贯彻落实《国务院关于进一步加强企业安全生产工作的通知》(国发〔2010〕23号)精神,深刻吸取这起事故教训,举一反三,进一步加强煤矿安全生产工作,确保安全生产形势持续稳定好转,特提出以下要求:

一、严把资源整合技改矿井的审批准入关。认真贯彻落实国家安全监管总局、国家煤矿安监局、国家发展改革委等13部门《关于进一步规范煤矿资源整合技改工作的通知》(安监总煤监〔2010〕185号)精神,进一步规范小煤矿资源整合技改工作。煤矿资源整合技改项目必须包含在省级人民政府批准的煤矿资源整合或兼并重组方案中,经核准或备案并取得采矿许可证、完成设计审批等行政许可手续之后,方可进行建设施工。资源整合方案中的所有煤矿和兼并重组方案中的被兼并煤矿,必须停止生产,原颁证(照)机关必须依法吊(注)销或变更其相关证(照)。被兼并煤矿需要技改的,必须在兼并重组主体企业按规定申请办理全部相关审批手续后方可进行建设;不需技改的,应按规定变更相关证照,并获得所有证(照)后方可依法依规组织生产。各有关部门要密切合作,严格审批,明确规定建设工期。凡整合技改期间非法违法组织生产的,一律取消整合技改资格,由地方人民政府依法予以关闭。

二、严厉打击非法违法生产建设行为。认真贯彻落实10月28日全国深入开展严厉打击非法违法生产经营建设行为专项行动视频会议精神,以事故多发区域、整合技改任务繁重区域、建设项目集中区域为重点,严厉打击各类非法违法生产建设行为。各部门要相互协调、密切配合,深入开展联合执法,依法关闭取缔无证无照、非法违法生产建设矿井。对列为关闭取缔对象的煤矿,加强日常监管,严防其突击生产;对已经公告关闭的矿井,要及时吊销证照、停供火工品、断电断水、炸毁填实井口、拉倒撤离井架,并遣散人员,真正做到彻底关闭、不留后患。

三、切实加强煤矿防治水工作。各地要进一步加大《煤矿防治水规定》(国家安全监管总局令第28号)的宣传贯彻力度,按照“预测预报、有疑必探、先探后掘、先治后采”的原则,加强水文地质基础工作,开展矿井充水条件分析,提高水害预测预报水平。发现水文地质情况异常时,要及时组织专业人员认真分析,采取措施,及时处理;未查明情况、未采取措施消除隐患的,不得进行采掘作业。发现透水征兆时,要立即停止作业,报告煤矿调度室,并立即撤出受水害威胁的所有作业人员;隐患未消除前,不得恢复生产。要进一步加大对煤矿防治水工作的监督检查力度,对未认真落实防治水有关规定、未按规定采取探放水措施的煤矿,坚决予以停产整顿。各地要加快建立健全防排水抢险救援基地建设,水文地质条件复杂、极复杂的煤矿企业、矿井,要装备必要的防治水抢险救灾设备。

四、全力做好岁末年初煤矿安全生产工作。各地要进一步增强做好煤矿安全生产工作的责任感、紧迫感,进一步突出预防为主、加强监管、落实责任,始终把安全生产放在各项工作的首位,加强组织领导能力,强化安全防范措施,强化现场管理,集中精力抓好岁末年初煤矿安全生产工作。四季度是事故易发期,要坚决防止因赶进度、追工期而超能力、超强度、超定员组织生产,忽视安全生产。各地一律不得下达超过煤矿核定生产能力的产量指标,对违反规定超能力、超强度、超定员组织生产的,要依法予以严处。

请迅速将本通报精神传达至辖区内所有煤矿企业,并督促抓好贯彻落实。

国务院安全生产委员会办公室

二○一○年十一月二十七日

最高人民法院西南分院关于婚姻案件被告现住国外或台湾无法传讯如何处理问题的批复

最高人民法院西南分院


最高人民法院西南分院关于婚姻案件被告现住国外或台湾无法传讯如何处理问题的批复

1951年12月1日,最高法院西南分院

你院法民字第3523号请示关于婚姻案件被告现住国外或台湾待解放地区(指一般人民)无法传讯应如何处理的问题,本院曾转请中央人民政府最高人民法院解答,现已得函复称:“关于该项问题前经中央人民政府司法部与法制委员会及华侨事务委员会共同研究后于一九五一年三月六日对华东司法部曾有批复……希即参酌办理”。
关于被告为现住台湾待解放地区的一般人民离婚问题,我们认为也应由法院从实际情况作适当的处理,如被告留在台湾,查无政治上的关系,仅因交通障碍不能即归,又不能由原告确认其有正当理由不堪再行同居者,可即说服原告撤回或迳以判驳其诉;在说服无效并不能迳予驳回时,亦适用公示程序宽定期限命原告将公示原文登报,使被告有应诉或提出书面答复的机会,俟逾期后再依调查研究的结果酌为缺席的判决。